The cases of the J7 'bombers''s friends have brought to light new CCTV images of the events of 7/7. I do not understand the reason why there was footage of the explosions shown at their trial, as the prosecution have made clear that these friends are in no way implicated in the making of the bombs or the carrying out of the explosions. This is purely to shock the Jury into compliance it seems. I cannot imagine why this is admissable evidence in this trial. See;

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/crime/article3724101.ece

CCTV footage reveals moment of 7/7 bombings

There is an interesting thing in this article where it is stated, for the first time to my knowledge that the 7.25am train was caught by the 'bombers' on 7/7.

Quote :

The three defendants stared intently at a screen outside the dock as the silent images recorded the day when four of their friends had set out for London. It started at 4am with pictures of Mohammed Sidique Khan, Shezhad Tanweer and Hasib Hussain driving from Leeds. Jermaine Lindsay, the fourth bomber, is seen arriving at Luton railway station in his burgundy Fiat Brava from his home in Aylesbury, Buckinghamshire. The other three bombers arrive and park beside his car. Colour footage shows the four passing through the barriers at Luton station each carrying a bulky back-pack. The camera tracks them on the platform before they board the train to London at 7.25am. An hour later comes the last sighting of the four together as they arrive at King’s Cross Thameslink. The jury was told that 25 minutes later the first of the four bombs went off at Edgware Road underground station, detonated by Khan. Pictures show the wrecked carriage where six passengers died.

For a discussion on the train times see;
http://www.julyseventh.co.uk/july-7-luton-kings-cross-train-times.html  

--Last edited by M.O on 2008-04-11 23:13:11 --

I think with regard to the train time, Charles Clarke when he finally admitted the train at 7.40 had been cancelled, as had been found out a short time after 7/7 by investigators, but still made it into the Official Narrative a year or so on, said that they had caught the earlier, 7.25, train.
Of course, if we tie this in with time stamp on the released CCTV dubious obscured shot of the guys outside Luton station, that would give them slightly less than 3 minutes to jog, without the return tickets they are alleged to have bought,to the platform from which the 7.25 train left, with the highly unstable TATP bombs on their backs, up and down the access stairs
Shoddy nonsense of course, and with the dual terror trials going on at present, we need to keep a very close eye

The alleged colour CCTV footage has not yet been released for public viewing. We can only judge it when it's released for scrutinisation  

--Last edited by dh on 2008-04-11 23:48:00 --

The 1st video on this page:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7377649.stm

Shows a time stamp of around 07.47,didn't the device go off about an hour later?

Note: Prosecutors showed the film in the trial of three Leeds men who deny assisting with target reconnaissance.

Makes you wonder if they were Patsies!

Some analysis from Muad'Dib

Quote :

Newly released BBC 7/7/2005 video-footage – more lies and propaganda. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7378468.stm The Nissan Micra is shown on camera 41071, at 03:59AM on 7/7/2005, allegedly in Leeds, in the dark with the headlights on, and then on the M1 motorway in daylight, with no time or date stamp, when they claim it was between 03:59AM and 04:50AM where Shehzad Tanweer was allegedly in some services on the M1 motorway filling the car with fuel. What time was daylight on 7/7/2005? Shehzad Tanweer is seen wearing WHITE sports trousers, a white Puma T-shirt, and a black jacket, whilst filling the car with fuel, allegedly at 04:50AM on 7/7/2005, according to the BBC, at a motorway services on the M1 motorway. No-one else is seen in or near the car, and there is no official time and date stamp, or camera number/place location visible on the video. Then the four patsies are allegedly shown in Luton Station car-park at 07:20:00AM at the rear of a car (NOT at 07:15 as the BBC has falsely signified). The BBC then zooms-in and we see them putting backpacks on with no time-stamp. Giving the BBC the benefit of the doubt; which is more than they are willing to do for the four dead patsies; that is presumably because they have enlarged just that portion of the photo. One of the people is visibly wearing WHITE trousers and a black jacket at 07:20:01+AM. In the faked single still frame official picture outside Luton Station, that is time and date stamped 07:21:54 – 7/7/2005, Shehzad Tanweer is allegedly (face unrecognizable) shown wearing BLACK sports trousers, a white Puma T-shirt, and a black jacket, but in the car-park, less than one minute and fifty-three seconds earlier, still wearing WHITE sports trousers and a black jacket, and putting on a backpack. No-one is recognizable/identifiable in this car-park video-footage. So; giving the BBC the benefit of the doubt again; in the absolute maximum time of 1 minute and 53 seconds, Shehzad Tanweer has, whilst walking from the car-park to the Luton Station entrance, carrying a large heavy back-pack, miraculously managed to change his trousers, in a public place, whilst walking at the same time, without falling over and hurting himself, whilst allegedly carrying very unstable explosives. Amazing feat don’t you think? I know he was supposed to be fit and an avid sportsman, probably with good balance, but, even so, this feat defies belief. Would any man, especially a Muslim, change his trousers in public, never mind whilst walking and carrying a heavy back-pack full of unstable explosives? Indecent exposure anyone? There certainly wasn’t enough time, in 1 minute and 53 seconds absolute maximum, for him to have gone anywhere private to get changed, and, in any case, why would he bother to get changed, if he was going to blow himself up anyway? Note also, that the grainy video-footage in the car-park at Luton Station has no time or date-stamp and no-one is recognizable/identifiable, so it is not credible evidence. Shehzad Tanweer is allegedly shown in King’s Cross, allegedly later that same day, again wearing black trousers. Same day? After the tubes trains have already left the platforms without them onboard? There is no official time and date stamp on the video-footage. WHY? White sports trousers, black sports trousers? Same day? Same time? None of these pictures is usable or admissible as evidence, because the people in the pictures are not indisputably identifiable in them, and we KNOW for a fact that the photo from outside Luton Station at 07:21:54AM has been faked. So that puts EVERY single piece of so-called evidence in doubt, and thus ALL of it must be excluded from any honest trial. There is therefore absolutely no evidence that the four patsies were guilty of any crime whatsoever. The fact that even one piece of evidence has been fabricated is enough, in a proper court, to have the entire case thrown out of court and the authorities and perpetrators arrested for attempting to pervert the course of justice. Then in its usual lying, libelous, propaganda fashion, the BBC, without a shred of real evidence, brazenly states that Shehzad Tanweer, Hasib Hussain and the others were suicide bombers, and guilty of crimes for which they have never been tried, never mind convicted, and for which there is absolutely no credible evidence on which to convict them. Yet still they have been found guilty by the evil government media propaganda machine – affectionately, and very deceptively referred to as Auntie Beeb. Auntie Beeb indeed! Who in their right mind would want an auntie like that? All of the recently released video-footage backs up the conclusions of the “7/7 Ripple Effect” film, and none of the video footage, leaving out the BBC’s false insertions and accusations, refutes it in any way at all. In fact it supports “7/7 Ripple effect” in every detail. Thank-you BBC for proving my point for me. The Truth will out. Matthew 10:26 Fear them not therefore: for there is nothing covered, that shall not be revealed; and hid, that shall not be known. 10:27 What I tell you in darkness, [that] speak ye in Light: and what ye hear in the ear, [that] preach ye upon the housetops. 10:28 And fear not them which kill the body, but are not able to kill the soul: but rather fear Him which is able to destroy both soul and body in hell-fire. Amen. And the authorities are using all of this to try to convict three people of helping four people to commit a crime for which they have never been convicted and for which there is absolutely no evidence on which to convict them, and fabricated evidence that proves they did not. What is even more disturbing, is that the high-profile lawyers for the three people being tried at Kingston Court have not even refuted, or questioned, the alleged guilt of the four dead patsies, even though they have all received a copy of the “7/7 Ripple Effect” film on DVD. Something about these lawyers stinks. Muad'Dib.